The Final Countdown
Well, here's what The Market thought of Tim Geithner, Bernanke and Obama Tuesday:

That, however, is not the chart that ought to cause President Obama to loose sleep. This one is:
The Triangle on that chart has a target ~3700 points lower, or if we were to break it tomorrow, approximately DOW 4200.
And that's the most bullish of the primary indices, all of which are sporting similar formations, and all of which closed right on the bottom boundary. Those of you who read The Ticker regularly know what my target is on the downside for the S&P 500 if this triangle breaks.
For the record, December closed at 8776 on the Dow Jones. The target on this technical formation is for a loss of another 50% from there, and as I said, that's the most bullish of the primary indices.
That would be back-to-back roughly 50% losses.
So if you think your 401k has been damaged (e.g. it turned into a 201k) there is a very high probability that it is about to be turned into a 101k.
What's worse is that this will be symptomatic of the broader economy. If you think the jobs lost and economic malaise are bad so far, you've seen nothing yet.
Why?
Because of President Obama and Tim Geithner.
The pair of them along with Obama's economic team have had three full months to figure out what to do about the economic mess.
Then, after priming the market for a big announcement on how they were going to deal with the banks, the gist of the announcement was "we don't know what the hell we're doing."
There were no specifics that mattered.
It gets worse. Bloomberg has article up which says:
"China should seek guarantees that its $682 billion holdings of U.S. government debt won’t be eroded by “reckless policies,” said Yu Yongding, a former adviser to the central bank.
The U.S. “should make the Chinese feel confident that the value of the assets at least will not be eroded in a significant way,” Yu, who now heads the World Economics and Politics Institute at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said in response to e-mailed questions yesterday from Beijing. He declined to elaborate on the assurances needed by China, the biggest foreign holder of U.S. government debt."
Uh huh. You mean we shouldn't try to print our way out of this mess? That Bernanke should not buy the long end of the bond curve, devaluing the currency, or if we do, that we should tell Beijing first so they can be the first ones in line to tender into it?
Geithner's testimony didn't help. Asked specifically if the banks were insolvent, he refused to answer the question. That's a "yes" my friends; a question like that which has a "no" answer (that is, it's all ok) is perfectly safe to answer under oath. The Market was wise enough to properly interpret that answer as "they're all broke" and did so, tanking further.
After weeks of pumping the market with claims of a solution, this sort of reaction to what was clearly a load of hot air should have been expected.
On top of that President Obama has been yelling like a petulant child that Congress "must pass his stimulus bill or the economy will never come out of the slump."
The problem with such pronouncements is that there is no way to win. If the bill passes and it is judged that the bill does little or nothing for the broader economy, then your credibility is destroyed, just as it is when you claim you're going to present a "comprehensive" bank solution and come up empty-handed on the details.
What has been the near $9 trillion in direct stimulus and guarantees pumped into the economy thus far - money we don't have? Are you trying to tell me that after having blasted that sort of fire-hose of debt into the economy, all without salutary effect, another $800 billion of spraying money around - again, money we don't have - will do the job?
Someone either has forgotten or is ignorant of this chart:
The more debt you pump, the less you get for it. Have we reached the point where it goes negative yet? I don't know, but the reaction of the economy and markets is suggesting that we are approaching the event horizon - a point beyond which the choices that must be made are between "bad" and "truly awful", yet like I mentioned in "Monetary Flat Spin" they are also counter-intuitive.
If President Obama thinks that Wall Street sold off hard because it is looking for "simple solutions" then he is truly tone deaf.
Wall Street sold off because investors are tired of being lied to and what Washington has been doing over the last eighteen months is lying, abusing this crisis to benefit their cronies and refusing to go after the people who robbed America blind and lock them up in prison where they belong.
Big banks were down 20-30%, wiping out the gains of the last few sessions. But the selloff wasn't limited to banks - it hit everything, because the market and economy has dealt with 18 months of lies and government obfuscation - propping up the bankrupt - and after rallying hard when such nonsense was put forward in the past only to have hopes dashed, now the market's reaction is to shoot first and ask questions never.
Unfortunately the broader economy is going to go down the precise same road, and if President Obama is not careful he is going to initiate a spiral of job losses that will make what occurred in the last quarter of 2008 look like a Girl Scout picnic.
President Obama's administration cannot get away with the false hope and disaster capitalism game, and neither can the stooges in Congress who float rumors about "Mark to Market" - if you're going to introduce a bill to suspend it Mr. Frank, then just do it.
The constant change of the rules in the middle of the game destroys confidence and that loss of confidence a huge part of why the market and economy totally fell apart last fall. It both can and will happen again if this pattern is not interrupted right now.
President Bush's Administration trashed its reputation and credibility and the result was a loss of fifty percent in the stock indices and fully 50% of the job losses taken in this recession happening in just three months.
Yesterday we came within a few hundred points of those levels on the DOW under Obama's Administration.
This is twice that President Obama has utterly dashed hopes in the market, with the first being his inauguration when the S&P 500 dropped 45 points.
Yesterday it also dropped 45 points, with both losses registering at roughly 5%.
Companies will not invest until the markets stabilize. You cannot expect firms to quit cutting staff and become hopeful for the future until the market stops gyrating widely as a consequence of Washington DC sticking its fingers in every orifice the market has, diddling this knob and jawboning that, leaving investors and executives unable to run their businesses and place trades in the belief that the rules are known and analysis of a firm's future prospects can be undertaken. It is that simple.
Mr. President, hope is not an investment strategy, speechifying doesn't do a thing and there are no Unicorns that crap out pretty colored candies. When you make a promise to the market, you either keep it or you provoke this sort of sell-off. When you provoke this sort of sell-off near a critical support level you risk an all-on crash - a crash that can initiate as soon as the same or next day - which will ripple through to the broader economy.
Days like yesterday in the market are responsible for one to two hundred thousand job losses each due to lost confidence - and lost wealth.
Once "purge-style" selling initiates it does not stop until it has run its course; until all the margin calls have been made and met, the investors wiped out and the last man stops screaming "SELL! SELL! SELL!", keeling over from heart failure. We saw this sort of cascade downward in September and October and all the press conferences in the world simply made it worse, because credibility was just flat-out gone.
From a technical perspective the market is in much worse shape than it was on the 20th of January, after which it bounced strongly. It is coming off overbought levels and as of tonight is sitting right on critical support. Should that support break the expected move is a full fifty percent down from where we are now.
If President Obama is to stop this an actual fully-baked plan must be put in place and all in the administration, including and most especially Geithner must stop lying.
Specifically:
Most of the big banks are insolvent. They know it and so does everyone else. Get it over with. Send in the examiners, mark to market on today's market values and then cram down debt to equity. If a bank cannot be restored to health in this fashion then wipe 'em out, sell off the good assets to regional and local banks, take over the bad assets in the FDIC and either sell 'em or run 'em down. Period. Suspend trading of all of these shares at once for two weeks and have at it. Those that are ok re-open on the exchanges; those that are not reopen too, but with the crammed-down bondholders as the new stockholders; the old stockholders are wiped out and management is removed.
Yes, I know there's a problem with the CDS. Issue an executive order declaring any naked CS to be contrary to public policy as instruments intended to manipulate the market and thus void. Let the Hedgies sue; I wish 'em "bonne chance" suing The Federal Government. Bingo - problem solved while allowing the legitimate protection for actual bonds to be purchased.
Our financial system has come to the brink of implosion as a consequence of the acts of these banksters. This was not the consequence of accidents - it was a consequence of intentional acts going back more than 20 years. We must have clawbacks, investigations and, if federal fraud indictments are indicated, bring 'em. Start now. The people will not accept the current and future pain that we will take without those responsible for intentional acts being held to account. Your mollycoddling of these malfeasors is an outrage after your claim to be "for the common man." Time to put up or shut up Mr. President.
Speaking of banksters, Fannie and Freddie are an abject mess. This problem must be solved, not swept under the rug. The fact of the matter is that the issues surrounding Fannie and Freddie's collapse devolve into inside dealing, cozy revolving door policies between these two firms and Congress along with outrageous pressure tactics and more. The cesspool must be drained.
Glass-Steagall, formal and inescapable reserve requirements (that cannot be "gamed" via sweep accounts and similar) applying to all deposits, an end to off-balance-sheet anything and an absolute ban on regulated financial institutions owning derivative-based "assets" must be put back in place immediately. This mess was caused by excessive leverage, off-balance-sheet game-playing, gaming of reserve requirements and creation of synthetic instruments that are in fact based on nothing but thin air. When the coupon payments stop on these synthetics they are literally worth zero because there is no hard asset (e.g. a house with a mortgage on it) behind them!
All of the existing "23A Exemptions" and other game-playing must be terminated right here and now. This must be done when the examiners show up and future use of these exemptions must be prohibited. If necessary, The Fed must be prohibited from granting such exemptions without explicit authorization of Congress.
Congress must restore the statutory reserve requirement that was removed by the EESA/TARP legislation. This is critical to the safety of the banking system and must be done immediately. The former level required was 8%, although I would argue that 10% is more appropriate and sound.
Leverage must be strictly regulated at no more than 12:1 for all United States institutions. Credit bubbles rely on the ability to obtain and abuse extreme leverage. Stop that, credit bubbles cannot form or be maintained. Period.
The Fed must be forced to consolidate and disclose all Fed District Bank activity on a nightly basis including loans outstanding, to which institution they are outstanding, and the collateral accepted along with the haircut applied in sufficient detail that any person desiring to do so can independently value it in the market on any given day.
Facilities at The Fed that amount to taking an equity position such as the Bear Stearns asset backstop ("Maiden Lane") and any other instance of non-recourse lending must cease immediately. The Fed is only permitted to "discount a note" - that is, make a loan. It does not have the statutory authority, exigent circumstances or no, to take equity positions in any instrument or institution. All such existing facilities must be shut down and disgorged immediately.
We understand that the issues are complex Mr. President. But what we as investors do not understand and refuse to accept are misrepresentations and broken promises.
We are in this mess as a direct and proximate result of that activity by those who allegedly were acting in the public trust and for our benefit in their granting of credit. This is now known not to be the case; they were acting for their benefit and to our detriment, and they gamed the system to keep from being held to account.
The market will not stabilize until trust is restored. Trust will not be restored until we have a trustworthy leader who keeps his promises and speaks the truth.
Period.
President Obama can either take these actions now - immediately - or he is consigned to suffer the consequences should the market and economy decide to discount a new Presidency less than one month in as a continuation of the Bush/Paulson regime - and go straight down the toilet along with the entirety of his political capital.
Your move Mr. President; in the meantime, I hope the market bounces today.
I really do.
But if it does not, I'm prepared to go "all in" short.
If President Obama insists on flushing this economy and market down the toilet all he will leave me with is attempting to make money on the ride into the sewer.
Comments
Discussion takes place at The Tickerforum Comment Zone (registration required to post)
No comments